Home

Ancient Philosophy

Business Ethics

Critical Thinking

Environmental Philosophy

Ethics

Greek Ethics

Individual & Society

Logic

Political Philosophy

Philosophy of Social Science

Philosophy of Sport

Philosophy of Technology

WORLD RELIGIONS

Athens

Greek History

Novels

Conferences & Journals

 

M. Andrew Holowchak
Itinerant Philosopher/Aging Powerlifter

Environmental Philosophy

Syllabus

Essay on Aristotle

 


Ethical Perspectives

How ought we to live our lives?

1) Skepticism: Ethically right action cannot be known or one can have degrees of probability that some action is ethically right.

     a) Partial: Truth cannot be known.

     b) Complete: Everything admits of doubt.

2) Relativism: Ethically right action varies from person to person, or culture to culture.

     a) Protagorean: Each person is his own best measure of what is right for him.

     b) Cultural: Each culture is its own best judge of what is ethically right for it.

3) Universalism: Ethically right action is universal and discoverable through reason.

     a) Virtue Ethics (Intentionalist and Circumstantialist): Right action is undergirded by ethical principles, but determined by circumstances.

     b) Utilitarianism (Outcome-Oriented): Right action is that which maximizes the human good, pleasure, or happiness for the greatest number of persons, so long as each person is considered to be no more than one.

     c) Deontology (Intentionalist): Ethically right action is action done not just in conformity with, but also from a duty to observe universally recognized principles.

4) Egoism: Each person ought to strive to maximize his own wellbeing.


Desjardins: Questions for Consideration

Chapter 1:

  • What is ethics, traditionally construed? How does the notion of "environmental ethics" challenge (deepen, widen?) this traditional construal?
  • How does science help direct environmental-ethics issues?  How does it impede our understanding of them? Why does it often do the latter more than the former?
  • Given two, is science really a value-neutral discipline?

Chapter 2:

  • What is the distinction between normative and philosophical ethics?
  • What are the reasons ethical theory is needed for environmental issues?

Chapter 3:

  • Why is the debate between preservationists and developers a philosophically tricky one?
  • What is the free-market solution to the debate? How does this employ economical considerations and how does it answer to the wants of people? Is this solution viable philosophically?
  • What are the limits/defects of the free-market approach?
  • What is the distinction between cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness?
  • What are the three measurement problems of attempts to quantify environmental issues?
  • How are wants or preferences different from values? What is wrong with treating all persons as wanting things?